Learn how you can scale AI with PixieBrix

Core Capabilities

• AI-Powered Search: Uses natural language processing (NLP) to surface answers from internal files, chats, and wikis.
• Semantic Understanding: Understands meaning and context, not just keywords.
• Personalization: Delivers results based on the user’s role, permissions, and activity history.
• Unified Indexing: Connects data across multiple SaaS apps for organization-wide search.
• Q&A and Chat Interface: Provides conversational access to internal documentation.
• Access Control: Respects enterprise-level permissions and data governance.

Target Users

• Mid-size to large enterprises with fragmented knowledge systems.
• Knowledge management, IT, and operations teams consolidating data across SaaS platforms.
• Customer support and engineering teams needing fast access to internal docs and historical context.

Pricing (as of 2025)

Glean does not publish public pricing. Based on analyst and customer reports:

• Pricing follows a per-seat enterprise license model.
• Typical pilots start at $25–$40 per user/month, with volume discounts for large organizations.
• Custom pricing tiers for API access, analytics, and advanced governance.

Glean centralizes knowledge discovery, while PixieBrix focuses on knowledge application - turning insights into action directly in the tools employees use. Companies often use both together: Glean for enterprise search, PixieBrix for workflow automation and in-browser execution.

Strengths

✅ Excellent semantic search and retrieval accuracy
✅ Strong enterprise security and compliance
✅ Easy onboarding for large organizations
✅ Useful analytics for knowledge usage trends

Limitations

⚠️ High per-seat cost for smaller teams
⚠️ Limited customization beyond prebuilt integrations
⚠️ Focused on search and retrieval, not execution or automation
⚠️ Requires IT-managed integration setup

Glean vs. PixieBrix